The Latest
Culture
Judicial “Putsch”
It turns out the Supreme Court has two buckets for holding ideas. One bucket holds the
ideas they like and the other the things they don’t like. However, the two buckets aren’t labeled ‘Likes’ and ‘Dis-likes.’ Oddly enough, one bucket is labeled ‘Constitutional’ and the other is labeled ‘Unconstitutional.’
Can you guess which bucket carries which label?
In our nation’s past, the Supreme Court relied on evidence, facts and relevant testimony to determine how any piece of legislation might appropriately fit within its constitutional boundaries.
Oregon’s Gun Grabbers Strain Reality
Oregon’s Gun Grabbers Strain Reality
The most insidious part of Oregon’s SB 941 is that it is designed to solve a problem that doesn’t exist. Illegal or criminal gun transfers and/or purchases are not happening amongst law-abiding citizens. This is disingenuous and farcical at best and down right evil at its worst.
Call or write these folks to tell them “NO on SB 941”
“NO on SB 941”
| Rep Paul Evans | 503-986-1420 | [email protected] |
| Rep Brent Barton | 503-986-1440 | [email protected] |
| Rep Deborah Boone | 503-986-1432 | [email protected] |
| Rep Brian Clem | 503-986-1421 | [email protected] |
| Rep Betty Komp | 503-986-1422 | [email protected] |
| Rep Caddy McKeown | 503-986-1409 | [email protected] |
Wonderful Satire – Travel back to the trials of life in 1903
Rare Original Letter from 1903
Originally Posted on April 10, 2015 by Dani
(Seeing as how this column (5 reasons marriage doesn’t work anymore) has become quite popular lately, I thought it was fitting to share this similar concern from a distressed gentleman in 1903, written to the New-York Tribune in a fit of distress.)
(Not really, this is my satire. But you get it… don’t you?) – Dani
Today’s MUST DO
Today, I have a MUST DO for you (and your posterity…)
I want to recommend a book that is a literal gold mine of history, ideas and strategies for Conservatives.
The book is TAKEOVER by Richard A. Viguerie.
Last Night’s Pizza-box and your 2nd Amendment Rights
Over-Stepping the Boundary Line
The anti-Federalists recognized the dangers of arbitrary, capricious or whimsical actions by a nation’s ruling class. The anti-Federalists also understood that it didn’t matter if the ruling class was comprised of an individual like our US President, or a monarch like King George III. They knew danger could also arise from oligarchies, or democracies when government oversteps it’s boundaries.
Over-stepping occurs constantly because of Republican traitors and Democratic idealists. The Democrats love big government and they are simply following their natural ideological bent.
Free to Choose? Yes or No?
This week is School Choice Week
There is a ton to celebrate!
See articles:
-
AEI kicks off school choice week
-
9 Things You Need To Know
-
Common Core Grading: Touchy-Feely
-
Friedman Foundation – Circle of Choice
My Podcast on School Choice
Books from our home to yours!
Read and recommended!
Right to Life – Passing the Baton
My thoughts in a Podcast regarding the “March for Life Rally” held in Klamath Falls last Thursday.
PS – Soon I’ll have a dedicated tab for Podcasts. This is just the beginning; I hope you enjoy listening!
Iron Handed Despotism
“Miserable is the lot of that people whose every concern
depends on the WILL and PLEASURE of their rulers.”
– Dissent of Pennsylvania Minority
In the article, Under the Guidance of an Arbitrary Government, I mentioned the anti-Federalists and I have received several questions about their ideas. Aside from, “Who are those guys?”, I received many questions about the motivations of the anti-Federalists, and their recommendations during the Constitutional convention of 1787.
Under the Guidance of an Arbitrary Government
Biggest Upset in 100 Years
Matt Kibbe, of FreedomWorks, reported today that over 13,000 phone calls and 20,000 messages were received by the U.S. House encouraging House members to vote against Rep. Boehner for Speaker of the House.
In his correspondence Kibbe told supporters, “You more than doubled the number of Republicans standing up to Boehner when you got 25 Republicans to vote against the Speaker– the biggest number in 100 years.”
This is fantastic because these true representative heroes, (although, “defectors” from the elite Republican ruling class), stood on principle. They did not stand on personal gain, enhanced standing or promises for committee chair positions. They stood on principle!
Conservatives vs. Boehner and the Republican Facade
Conservative Challenger to the Establishment’s Gang
Rep. Louis Gohmert (R-Texas) said Sunday that he will challenge John Boehner (R-Ohio) as Speaker in the new Congress.
“I’m putting my name out there today to be another candidate for Speaker,” Gohmert said on “Fox and Friends.” Gohmert said that after “years of broken promises, it’s time for a change.”
This is Good News
This is important for all Americans and especially for Republicans.
